Hazards Demand Proper Protection

  • By Donald F. Groce
  • Sep 15, 2008

Gloves are the first line of defense for many necessary tasks in our hazardous world.

With new hazards emerging weekly, ensuring safer, more secure environments is more challenging than ever before. The importance of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is constantly being brought to the forefront by natural disasters, such as wildfires, flooding in America’s heartland, tornados, and hurricanes; as well as health concerns about pathogenic microorganisms, such as MRSA and H5N1 virus (avian flu).

Protecting consumers’ and workers’ hands from contaminants is a key aspect of any cleanup or response effort. There are specific protective features to consider, depending on the situation and materials encountered.

Naturally Occurring Disasters
It is evident that cleanup from flooding and other natural disasters will be an ongoing issue. In the recent flooding, many chemical companies along the Mississippi were flooded. Debris from municipal sewage is always a big concern when large areas are flooded, and mold in flooded homes and businesses can become a serious health problem. Any remediation effort requires that workers wear proper protective masks, gloves, and garments.

Often, the same type of gloves may be used for the administration of medical relief, food services, remediation, and reconstruction efforts. For example, disposable natural rubber latex (NRL), nitrile, or even vinyl gloves may be suitable for protecting all workers. However, it is always a good idea to seek the most qualified products with the highest level of protection required for each task, whether it be food service, first aid administration, rescue, recovery, demolition, or reconstruction.


For tasks such as these, the National Fire Protection Association has assembled technical committees from all aspects of emergency medical operations, as well as hazardous materials incidents, to devise standards designed to protect rescuers (both the first responder and the first receiver). Gloves that are NFPA 1999 Certified for emergency medical services must pass a series of applicable tests in an independent, third-party certification laboratory. They must provide a specific level of protection or performance level for each key criterion, such as fit, dexterity, protection from viral penetration, protein levels, rubber properties, and puncture resistance.

As floodwaters recede, cleanup efforts change. The clearing of debris requires a much different set of protective gear: general purpose, heavy-duty work gloves and cut-resistant gloves with excellent abrasion resistance and a long usable life.

It is important to remember that no glove offers protection from a moving or serrated blade. However, for conditions that may result from the long use of items such as chainsaws, where repetitive motion injuries may occur, a vibration-dampening glove can lessen the impact of such injuries. Manufacturers also offer lightly coated, thinner, better-fitting gloves that provide abrasion resistance and cut resistance for demanding jobs, such as construction.

Thinner gloves allow the worker to do many tasks for which he previously took the gloves off to gain dexterity. They encourage workers to wear them longer and for more tasks so that injuries are reduced and, in many cases, eliminated.

MRSA: Today’s Threatening Super-Bug
Natural disasters are one threat. New super-bugs are another. Although bird flu has not mutated in a form contagious in human beings, a mutated form of the common bacterium Staph is spreading throughout the United States: Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA).

Years of prescribing and over-prescribing penicillin-based antibiotics have resulted in mutation of Staph into a virulent form that resists common antibiotics and causes severe, sometimes disfiguring, skin infections that can spread to other body systems and may cause fatal infections. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently estimated MRSA will cause more deaths than AIDS this year.One of the problems with an organism such as MRSA is that it is endemic. Common Staph lives on the skin or in the noses of 25 to 30 percent of the population and exists in people who are not sick.

Although not generally categorized as a pandemic, MRSA is worldwide, and the problem is growing. Reporting is not mandatory, and public health figures show that it is drastically under-reported. Public health agencies agree the criteria for MRSA reporting are too stringent. Many hospitals now screen patients for MRSA upon admittance. The number of cases they are seeing is cause for major concern.

Hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) has been a problem in hospitals and nursing homes for years. Community-acquired MRSA has now surfaced and is in the headlines every day as whole school systems shut down to disinfect and decontaminate when infections occur.


This article originally appeared in the September 2008 issue of Occupational Health & Safety.

Comments

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Poll

What was the biggest workplace safety story of 2008?





Links

Security Cameras: The Internet's #1 distribution source for all security camera products.