OSHA’s recent guidance document
for protecting against the skin ailments
related to portland cement
exposure was a handy reminder that
impact hazards are not the only one to be
addressed by your foot protection program.
Bricklayers, carpenters, laborers,
concrete finishers, ready-mixed concrete
truck drivers, and other workers who may
be exposed to wet cement need waterproof
boots to prevent contact with their
skin, and some crafts also need waterproof
kneepads or dry kneeboards so
their knees won’t touch wet cement when
they’re kneeling on it. Skin care is a must
in these circumstances.
Protection against impact and crushing hazards is our topic for today, however. These hazards can come into play for construction work of all kinds, and also for warehouse and delivery work, law enforcement and emergency response, shipyard jobs, and many more.
An effective impact
protection program follows the standard
hierarchy of controls:
• Elimination
• Substitution
• Engineering controls
• Administrative controls
• Personal protective equipment
It’s fairly easy to see how to apply the hierarchy in most settings. A crushing hazard posed by manual movement of heavy, wheeled carts could be averted by substituting a different type of cart, changing the cart movers’ travel paths so other workers don’t have to cross those paths or step into them from behind walls and other obstructions, or installing rigid barriers to prevent visitors and personnel from stepping into the path of a cart. All of these could be done simultaneously; the movement of materials also could be automated, perhaps by use of a conveyor, which is a costly correction that presents a different set of worker hazards.
Safety professionals know that the controls at the top of the hierarchy are more effective and more protective than those at the bottom. Following the hierarchy will bring about inherently safer operations that reduce costs, in most cases. Elimination and substitution are the most difficult to implement in existing processes, where administrative controls and PPE are more frequently used if the hazards are not well controlled, NIOSH has noted.
If the less expensive option is chosen, the fifth and final level in the hierarchy is sure to be part of the solution. The cart movers need protective footwear and those working near them probably will, too. This footwear should meet the ASTM F2413-05 standard, which addresses minimum requirements for the performance, design, testing, and classifications of protective footwear. (The related ASTM F2412-05, Standard Test Methods for Foot Protection, specifies the protective qualities that toe and metatarsal impactresistant footwear should have against falling objects and compressive forces. Visit www.astm.org for more information.)
Preventing Crushing Injuries
Steel-toe footwear—a hot topic in safety
since this category was exempted from
OSHA’s “employer pays for PPE” rule earlier
this year—is the basic, essential element
in PPE to prevent foot crushing
injuries. The footwear should be chosen to
match workers’ exposures, and it’s possible
there are multiple exposures (slip hazards
come to mind) for which footwear must be
carefully evaluated and selected. Make
sure to involve the employees in your
hazard analysis and PPE selection; they
know the hazards of their work better than
anyone else.
Crushing injuries may result from a dropped or toppling object or inattention. They can happen when someone’s foot is caught in a crack or crevice and struck. Moving equipment and vehicles are additional hazards.
OSHA’s general industry standard for occupational foot protection is 29 CFR 1910.136. Not only can you find its text easily on www.ohsa.gov, but also you’ll get the relevant Standards Interpretation letters OSHA has issued referencing it. It’s important to note that the standard leaves protection decisions up to the employer, but it does require that protections be in place if employees are exposed to specific types of hazards—however infrequent that exposure may be, OSHA has said. The standard tells employers to “ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee’s feet are exposed to electrical hazards.”
It should be made clear to employees that they are responsible for telling their supervisor when there’s a problem. Supervisors are responsible for employee compliance with the employer’s work rules, for counseling employees about hazards and PPE to guard against them, and for documenting non-compliance when it occurs.
About the author
Fred Elliott
Fred Elliott is a freelance author in Austin, Texas, who writes frequently about occupational safety and health topics. The checklist accompanying this article was modified from a hazard assessment/PPE checklist offered by the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries.